AMD hits 3.4GHz with a little more ease
Some folks scoffed when AMD elected to introduce the Phenom II X4 965 processor back in August with a 140W thermal design power (TDP), because that pushed beyond AMD's customary peak of 125W for desktop processors. The move wasn't without precedent, but it signaled that AMD's 45nm chips couldn't reach the 3.4GHz mark without a bit of extra juice.
Now, some months later, AMD has introduced a revised version of the Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor (say the name in a single breath for extra credit, kids) with a 125W TDP. The thermal improvement comes hand in hand with a couple other tweaks. For one, the memory controller has been altered to support the use of four DDR3 DIMMs at 1333MHz.
Also, an enhanced halt state, C1E, is now supported in hardware. Naturally, implementing power-state switching in hardware is much faster than software, and AMD says that means power management schemes should now have "virtually no impact" on performance. AMD processors have had a bit of a rocky history on this front in recent years, with power-management features potentially compromising performance in certain situations. Sounds like they're cleaning that up. Still, I wouldn't expect much of a difference in regular use. We tested with power management schemes enabled in our last major CPU review, of the Intel Lynnfield processors, and we did some spot checks along the way with power management disabled, too. Generally, we found that enabling and disabling power management had very little to no effect on most tests.
The reduction in the processor's TDP rating comes with a real reduction in power use. Here's a quick glance at power use from the Damage Labs test bench. These results show full-system power draw following the test methods and configurations outlined in our Lynnfield review.


There's virtually no change to power draw at idle, but power draw under load is down by 9W versus our example of the earlier 140W version of the X4 965. That's good, but then in this particular application, the X4 965's performance just barely surpasses that of the Core i5-750. So the power efficiency picture isn't altered much. Here's the proof.

Still, moving into the 125W thermal envelope ought to allow the X4 965 to find its way into more systems from big PC makers, along with enabling broader compatibility with existing AMD-oriented mobos and CPU coolers.
AMD suggests it may have also bought itself a little more overclocking headroom with this new rev of silicon. And yes, this is an unlocked Black Edition processor. Sadly, we haven't yet had time to test that theory with our X4 965 125W sample. I do feel a CPU comparison coming on, though. Perhaps soon.
Oh, and if you're looking to purchase the 125W version of the X4 965, look for a part number ending in M, as in HDZ965FBK4DGM, or modest or meek. That's the 125W model. The part number for the 140W version ends in I, as in HDZ965FBK4DGI, or incinerate or inferno. Just sayin'.
-
70 comments —
Last by Kaleid at 1:36 PM on 11/15/09 - Email the author(s): Scott Wasson
- Sign up to receive notices when we publish new articles
- Or go back to TR's front page
-
Intel's Xeon 5600 processors
These Xeons promise two more cores at the same clock speed and TDP. How good are they? We collected a host of systems in Damage Labs to find out. Read more...
36 comments —
Last by WasF at 3:57 AM on 07/27/10 -
Opteron 4100 series aims for the clouds
After telegraphing its intentions for quite some time, AMD followed through today with the official unveiling of the Opteron 4100 series of processors. Read more...
48 comments —
Last by poulpy at 5:06 PM on 07/05/10 -
Intel's Core i7-875K and i5-655K processors
Intel has unlocked a pair of affordable CPUs, making overclocking dead simple. Join us as we welcome the K series to the 4GHz+ club. Read more...
128 comments —
Last by indeego at 10:40 PM on 06/25/10 -
Inside Intel's Atom Z600 series
The new Atom platform, code-named Moorestown, brings a PC-compatible system into a pocket-sized package with dramatically reduced power consumption. Read more...
107 comments —
Last by Meadows at 2:06 PM on 05/10/10 -
AMD's Phenom II X6 processors
At last, AMD has added turbocharging to its suite of CPU technologies, giving us a six-cylinder processor that's bulging with potential for questionable car analogies. Fortunately, the Phenom II X6 stands on its merits as a worthy challenger to some of Intel's best CPUs. Read more...
154 comments —
Last by anotherengineer at 1:01 PM on 05/25/10 -
Intel's Core i7-980X Extreme processor
Intel's dominance with the Nehalem Core i7s has been nearly complete, yet a replacement will soon arrive in the form of Gulftown, a six-core monster with 12MB of cache. How good is it? Should it replace your Pentium 4? Your Core 2 Quad Q6600? We investigate. Read more...
206 comments —
Last by indeego at 11:12 AM on 05/29/10 -
Core i3 takes on Athlon II
What happens when you test the Core i3-530 against the Athlon II X4 in a broad suite of benchmarks, while considering power efficiency, overclocking headroom, value, and historical perspective? Repetitive strain injury, if you're us. For you, though, we have a massive, comprehensive CPU roundup. Read more...
167 comments —
Last by beamishboy at 4:34 PM on 05/28/10 -
Intel's Core Mobile CPUs debut in Asus' K42F notebook
Arrandale is Intel's first mainstream notebook CPU based on the Nehalem microarchitecture, and it shares the same potent silicon as the new Clarksfield desktop CPUs. We have the goods on the new Core Mobile lineup and a look at Asus' first Arrandale-based notebook, the affordable K42F. Read more...
32 comments —
Last by MadManOriginal at 3:43 PM on 01/17/10
